{"id":341,"date":"2020-06-19T15:52:25","date_gmt":"2020-06-19T13:52:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pantrop.com\/?p=341"},"modified":"2020-06-22T10:21:48","modified_gmt":"2020-06-22T08:21:48","slug":"tropics-book","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pantrop.com\/?p=341","title":{"rendered":"New Book: \u2018Tropical Forests in Prehistory, History, and Modernity\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

In popular discourse, tropical forests are synonymous with ‘nature’ and ‘wilderness’, battlegrounds between apparently pristine floral, faunal, and human communities, and the unrelenting industrial and urban powers of the modern world. Most people are not aware of the extent of human adaptation to, and alteration of, tropical forest environments, and that these interactions have been ongoing across archaeological, historical, and anthropological timescales. The new book published by Oxford University Press on 17 January 2019. The publication emerges from my work on projects in the tropics of Asia, Africa, and the Americas, and takes a tour of human, and human ancestor, occupation and use of tropical forest environments through time.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In \u2018Tropical Forests in Prehistory, History, and Modernity\u2019, I argue that, far from being pristine ecosystems, tropical forests have been occupied and modified by our species from the earliest stages of our evolution. The text, aimed at a broad audience of students to specialized researchers spanning archaeology, anthropology, history, and ecology, explores the sophisticated agricultural strategies and vast urban networks appeared in tropical forests long prior to the arrival of European colonial powers and later industrialization. However, this should not be taken as justification for the massive 21st century threats facing tropical forest ecosystems. Rather, I suggest that such a long-term perspective should highlight the ongoing challenges of sustainability faced by forager, agricultural, and urban societies in these environments, setting the stage for more integrated approaches to conservation and policy-making, and the protection of millennia of ecological and cultural heritage bound up in these habitats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

More complex hominin and human origins<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since Darwin wrote the Descent of Man<\/em>in 1871, tropical forests, and their non-human ape inhabitants, have often been perceived as being left behind by hominins as they gained increasingly \u2018human\u2019 traits of tool use, medium-large game hunting, and upright locomotion in open savannas. However, there is growing evidence for complexity in this trend. In this new book, I argue that morphological, palaeoenvironmental, and palaeodietary evidence highlights the persistent use of tropical forests, exemplifying the habitat variability between 7 and 3 million years ago that may have ultimately driven the evolution of our genus (Homo<\/em>) towards the end of this period.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similarly, the evolution and dispersal of our own species, Homo sapiens<\/em>, has frequently been linked to grassland settings or productive coastal environments. Meanwhile, tropical forests have often been seen as barriers to human dispersal. In contrast, I emphasise that evidence in tropical forests from around the world demonstrates that our species rapidly colonized these habitats. This adds to data from other \u2018extreme\u2019 habitats, such as deserts, high altitude habitats, and the palaeoarctic, that highlight the unique ecological and cultural plasticity of our species as it colonized the Late Pleistocene world and came to be the last hominin standing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Taming the tropics<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Not only did our species adapt to tropical forests, but there is also growing data that hunter-gatherers managed tropical forests from as early as 45,000 years ago, using fire to create local, mixed habitats with abundant useful plant and animal species. Nevertheless, discussions of \u2018agriculture\u2019 in archaeology have tended to focus on dry, grassland settings, such as those found in the Middle East. Tropical forests, by contrast, have been argued to have soils that are too poor or vulnerable for farming, and that they lacked animals suitable for domestication.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I review evidence from around the world to show how this perspective has been overturned. For example, the tending of yams, bananas, and taro in Early Holocene New Guinea represents one of the earliest archaeological examples of farming. Furthermore, research in South Asia, Southeast Asia, Africa, and the Neotropics reveals that a diversity of plants and animals, including maize, chicken, water buffalo, mango, black pepper, and sweet potato, which are crucial to global cuisine and subsistence today, likely or definitely originated in tropical forest settings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In reviewing prehistoric evidence for tropical agriculture we can, however, see a clear difference in the ultimate ecological impact of \u2018indigenous\u2019 tropical forest agriculture, based on local tropical plants and animals, versus the introduction of \u2018external\u2019 farming practices. This is still visible in the modern world as \u2018plantation\u2019 agriculture or \u2018ranching\u2019 results in reductions in local tropical biodiversity, soil erosion, and deforestation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2018Lost cities\u2019 or legacies of sustainability?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Not only does the evidence reviewed in the book document clear cases of prehistoric agriculture in tropical forests, but there is also growing data that these forms of food production supported vast urban cities. New techniques and survey, notably those using canopy-penetrating Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), have revealed human settlement in the Americas and Southeast Asia on a scale that was previously unimagined.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In many cases these cities show a tendency towards \u2018low density agrarian urbanism\u2019, whereby agricultural fields, orchards, and households are dispersed around a bureaucratic centre. This organization contributed to the resilience of these settlements that in some cases clearly persisted many times longer than more recent industrial and urban settlements of the modern world have so far been present in these environments. The largest, Greater Angkor, was the most extensive pre-industrial urban sprawl ever recorded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evidence reviewed in the book highlights that these dispersed urban settlements were most successful where they utilized a diversity of wild and domesticated resources. For example, in the Amazon, \u2018Garden Cities\u2019 made consistent use of freshwater fish and even farmed turtles, while the populations living within Classic Maya cities corralled wild deer and used semi-wild orchards while also relying on maize farmed in forest \u2018gardens\u2019 rather than monoculture plantations. Such cases give pause for thought for tropical urban centres today that often rely on monoculture or dense rearing conditions for domesticated animals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Uniting prehistory, history, and the present<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beyond archaeology, the book seeks to take a multidisciplinary perspective to appeal to a wide range of research backgrounds and interests. For example, I use history and ethnography to critique western perspectives of Indigenous people living in tropical forests today, who are often considered \u2018isolated\u2019 or \u2018untouched\u2019, and passive in the face of the expansion of global industry and trade. I argue that these groups are often active agents, and have engaged in some of the most successful instances of combining global capitalism with the needs and demands of local tropical forest ecosystems. As such they must be included in any discussion of sustainable conservation, development, and policy, rather than be treated as passive entities to be protected or relocated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The book also reviews the practical ways in which archaeology can contribute to conservation in tropical forest ecosystems today. This includes evaluation of \u2018re-wilding\u2019 opportunities for specific plants and animals, the reconstruction of past environmental change to aid future predictions, and to highlight the social, cultural, and ecological constraints that have faced different types of social organization and types of tropical forest environment in the past.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tropical forests are central to earth systems today, with local deforestation potentially having global ramifications. Long-term evidence for human interactions with these environments does not give a free pass for their destruction today, particularly as global capitalism ensures major ecosystem destruction can be driven by consumers on the other side of the planet. Instead, we should try to use the past, as well as the knowledge held by various local stakeholders, to develop methods for sustainable modification of different tropical forests ensuring that the oldest terrestrial environments on our planet continue to stand as crucial time capsules of cultural and ecological heritage for future generations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In popular discourse, tropical forests are synonymous with ‘nature’ and ‘wilderness’, battlegrounds between apparently pristine floral, faunal, and human communities, and the unrelenting industrial and…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":342,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[12,13,14,11],"class_list":["post-341","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-research-news","tag-archaeology","tag-humanimpacts","tag-oup","tag-tropicalforest"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pantrop.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/341","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pantrop.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pantrop.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pantrop.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pantrop.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=341"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/www.pantrop.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/341\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":406,"href":"https:\/\/www.pantrop.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/341\/revisions\/406"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pantrop.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/342"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pantrop.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pantrop.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pantrop.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}